Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Assignment 1: Gelatin Printed-Out-Prints (POPs)



Gelatin Printed-Out-Prints (POPs)

Image taken from: http://www.graphicsatlas.org/media/images/GelatinPOP_ID_Tone4_Fullscreen.jpg

Inventor(s)

The invention of Gelatin Printed-Out-Prints (POPs) results from the coming together of multiple technologies by the work of several men.  In 1871 an English physician named Richard Leach Maddox introduced gelatin emulsions to the world as an alternative to—and improvement on—the wet collodion process.[i]  Improvements made by Richard Kennett in 1873 and Charles Harper Bennett in 1878 allowed for Maddox’s process to really take flight.[ii]  Several other inventors, including Peter Mawdsley, Josef Marie Eder, Giuseppe Pizzighelli, and Sir William de Wiveleslie Abney, can all be credited with important contributions to the research and development of the silver gelatin photographic process.[iii]  The invention of the baryta layer (an important layer in a silver gelatin POP) is attributed to José Martinez-Sanchez and Jean Laurent in 1866.[iv]

The first printing-out paper was developed in Munich in 1867 by Emil Obernetter, and was coated with a collodio-chloride emulsion.[v]  In 1885 his son, Johann Baptist Obernetter, developed a similar paper using a gelatin emulsion.[vi]  It is here we really have the birth of the gelatin POP.

As somewhat of a side-note, it isn’t until 1891 that the term “printing-out paper” (and the subsequent acronym POP) is first used by the Ilford Company to describe this kind of paper.[vii]


The Basics

Gelatin POPs were commonly used between 1885 and 1910.[viii]  The “printing-out” process itself refers to the fact that when exposed directly to light the image will gradually appear on the paper; there is no developing required.[ix]

            The Layers of a Gelatin POP:
                        The bottom layer of a gelatin POP will be the paper substrate; then comes
                        the baryta layer; then a layer of silver (toned) particles in gelatin (the matting
                        agent); and finally a layer surface coating on top.[x]

The Silver Gelatin POP Process:
1. Printing-out paper is placed under a negative into a special copy frame.
2. The copy frame is exposed to light (either daylight or artificial light) until the image is developed to the desired image intensity. Guides for approximate exposure times were usually available from the paper manufacturers for various lighting conditions.
3. The exposed POP is washed in a water bath to remove any excess of soluble silver salts.
4. The washed POP is then toned using different types of gold and platinum toners; or using first a gold, then a platinum toner.
5. The toned POP is washed again to remove toning chemicals and fixed using the standard hypo (sodium thiosulfate) fixer.
6. The toned and fixed photograph is thoroughly washed in running water or in multiple water changes in a water tray.
7. The washed photograph is air dried or surface polished by squeegeeing the print on a clean, polished glass and letting it dry. The fully dried photograph will usually separates from the glass surface on its own.
8. Many dried POPs are then retouched and mounted on a more sturdy paper or paper board support.
9. Some POPS are also varnished or surface coated to modify their appearance and/or protect them from physical and environmental damage.[xi]


Uses

The development of the sliver gelatin POP process helped satisfy the need for “easy” photographic printing from both large-format and small-format cameras.[xii]  The POP paper was sensitive enough that it could be exposed to daylight, as well as artificial light such as gas lights, kerosene lamps, or early electrical lightbulbs (without needing the total darkness of a darkroom), and the image would still come out.[xiii] 

Gelatin POPs were most commonly produced as “cabinet cards;” which are a 4.25” x 6.5” paperboard mount format.[xiv] The process was widely used for commercial portraiture in the 1890s.[xv]  Another application of the POP papers was as image-proofing materials to assess the quality of negatives.[xvi]



How to Identify

As with all silver printing-out processes, gelatin POPs have a reddish-brown image color when printed out; however, most were also toned, usually with gold, which changed the color to more of a purplish-brown.[xvii]  Over time, most gelatin POPs are subject to some level of sulfiding—a process in which residual sodium thiosulfate (the fixer) causes the image to turn greenish to yellowish-brown, accompanied by fading.[xviii]  Early gelatin POPs were made with glossy, or occasionally matte, surfaces; after the start of the twentieth century more textures became available.[xix]  This can be a way to approximately date gelatin POPs.  Gelatin POPs can somewhat resemble albumen prints because of their purplish-brown color; however, at 30X magnification they can easily be distinguished from albumen by the presence of a smooth baryta layer which hides all traces of paper fibers.[xx]


 Preservation Concerns

There were three types of surface finishing treatments used with gelatin POPs: matte drying, ferrotyping (where a wet print was dried in contact with a highly polished surface like metal or glass), and burnishing.[xxi]  Each of these has their own problems.  Ferrotyped POPs were more brittle and more prone to cracking than air-dried surfaces.[xxii]  As with all prints with gelatin binders, unmounted gelatin POPs often curled under various conditions.  Curling occurs inward under dry conditions and outward under humid conditions.[xxiii]

A common form of deterioration in gelatin POPs is surface abrasion.  This was most serious with mounted and burnished prints.[xxiv]

As mentioned earlier, gelatin POPs start out with a reddish-brown or purplish-brown appearance, but when exposed to moisture and oxidants over time, the image will fade and become more yellowish-brown.  Sulfiding deterioration is more common in gelatin POPs over albumen prints because its thicker support and baryta layer tend to hold more thiosulfate than albumen prints do.[xxv]  This leads to the very distinctive greenish to yellowish-brown image color of older gelatin POPs.  If the print was washed very well and there was less thiosulfate retained, and if the print has been kept under very dry conditions, it’s possible to have an image that has not been completely faded.[xxvi]



[i] Newhall, Beaumont. The History of Photography. New York: The Museum of Modern
            Art, 1982: p.123

[ii]  Ibid. p. 124
[iii] Stulik, Dusan C., and Art Kaplan. “Silver Gelatin.” In The Atlas of Analytical
            Signatures of Photographic Processes. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2013.
            las_silver_gelatin.pdf: p. 4
[iv] Ibid.
[v] Newhall, Beaumont. The History of Photography. New York: The Museum of Modern
            Art, 1982: p.126
[vi] Ibid.
[vii] Coe, Brian, and Mark Haworth-Booth. A Guide To Early Photographic Processes.
            England: The Victoria and Albert Museum in association with Hurtwood Press,
            1983: p. 23
[viii] “Gelatin POP.” Graphics Atlas. Image Permanence Institue, 2015.
[ix] Coe, Brian, and Mark Haworth-Booth. A Guide To Early Photographic Processes.
            England: The Victoria and Albert Museum in association with Hurtwood Press,
            1983: p. 23
[x] Stulik, Dusan C., and Art Kaplan. “Silver Gelatin.” In The Atlas of Analytical
            Signatures of Photographic Processes. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2013.
            las_silver_gelatin.pdf: p. 7
[xi] Ibid. pp.5-6
[xii] Ibid. pp.6-7
[xiii] Ibid. p. 7 
[xiv] “Gelatin POP.” Graphics Atlas. Image Permanence Institue, 2015.
                http://www.graphicsatlas.org/identification/
[xvi] Stulik, Dusan C., and Art Kaplan. “Silver Gelatin.” In The Atlas of Analytical
            Signatures of Photographic Processes. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2013.
            las_silver_gelatin.pdf: p. 7
[xvii] Coe, Brian, and Mark Haworth-Booth. A Guide To Early Photographic Processes.
            England: The Victoria and Albert Museum in association with Hurtwood Press,
            1983: p. 23
[xviii] “Gelatin POP.” Graphics Atlas. Image Permanence Institue, 2015.
                http://www.graphicsatlas.org/identification/
[xix] Stulik, Dusan C., and Art Kaplan. “Silver Gelatin.” In The Atlas of Analytical
            Signatures of Photographic Processes. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2013.
            las_silver_gelatin.pdf: p. 8
[xx] Reilly, James M.. Care and Identification of 19th-Century Photographic Prints. USA:
            Eastman Kodak Company, 1986:  p. 67
[xxi] Ibid. pp. 44-45
[xxii] Ibid. p. 44
[xxiii] Ibid. p. 45
[xxiv] Ibid.
[xxv] Ibid.
[xxvi] Ibid.

Bibliography

Coe, Brian, and Mark Haworth-Booth. A Guide To Early Photographic Processes.
            England: The Victoria and Albert Museum in association with Hurtwood Press,
            1983.

“Gelatin POP.” Graphics Atlas. Image Permanence Institue, 2015.

Newhall, Beaumont. The History of Photography. New York: The Museum of Modern
            Art, 1982.

Reilly, James M.. Care and Identification of 19th-Century Photographic Prints. USA:
            Eastman Kodak Company, 1986.

Stulik, Dusan C., and Art Kaplan. “Silver Gelatin.” In The Atlas of Analytical Signatures
            of Photographic Processes. The Getty Conservation Institute, 2013.
            las_silver_gelatin.pdf







No comments:

Post a Comment